<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (2) TMI 230 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154398</link>
    <description>Rule 14-A(9) was treated as a machinery provision permitting reassessment whenever tax had been assessed at too low a rate for any reason, after notice and enquiry. On the facts, concessional tax had been allowed on the basis of invalid D forms because the buyers were not governmental institutions, so the earlier assessments resulted in tax at a lower rate. The Court held that the provision was not confined by a rigid change-of-opinion limitation and distinguished authorities construing narrower reopening language. Reassessment was therefore upheld and the objection based on change of opinion failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 15:33:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (2) TMI 230 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154398</link>
      <description>Rule 14-A(9) was treated as a machinery provision permitting reassessment whenever tax had been assessed at too low a rate for any reason, after notice and enquiry. On the facts, concessional tax had been allowed on the basis of invalid D forms because the buyers were not governmental institutions, so the earlier assessments resulted in tax at a lower rate. The Court held that the provision was not confined by a rigid change-of-opinion limitation and distinguished authorities construing narrower reopening language. Reassessment was therefore upheld and the objection based on change of opinion failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>