<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (6) TMI 173 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154384</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 12(3) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 may be sustained where incriminating slips found in the dealer&#039;s business premises support a sustained estimate of suppressed turnover, even if the assessment is based on best judgment. The assessee&#039;s explanation that the slips belonged to contractors or third parties was rejected, and the authorities treated the documents as evidence of unrecorded labour charges and stock deficiencies. The court distinguished earlier authority where rejection of explanation went to assessability itself, and held that the material found, together with the estimated suppression, was sufficient to invoke the penal provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 14:21:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (6) TMI 173 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154384</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 12(3) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 may be sustained where incriminating slips found in the dealer&#039;s business premises support a sustained estimate of suppressed turnover, even if the assessment is based on best judgment. The assessee&#039;s explanation that the slips belonged to contractors or third parties was rejected, and the authorities treated the documents as evidence of unrecorded labour charges and stock deficiencies. The court distinguished earlier authority where rejection of explanation went to assessability itself, and held that the material found, together with the estimated suppression, was sufficient to invoke the penal provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>