<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (12) TMI 281 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154365</link>
    <description>A mining grant conferring the right to enter land, work limestone, use the surface as necessary, and remove minerals was treated as a lease of immovable property under section 105 of the Transfer of Property Act, not as a licence or agreement to sell. The absence of exclusive possession of the whole area did not change that character. Because the arrangement was a lease, royalty paid under it was consideration for the lease and not the purchase price of goods. As there was no underlying sale or purchase, the conditions for levy under section 6-A of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 were not met, and sales tax could not be imposed on the royalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2013 18:11:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (12) TMI 281 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154365</link>
      <description>A mining grant conferring the right to enter land, work limestone, use the surface as necessary, and remove minerals was treated as a lease of immovable property under section 105 of the Transfer of Property Act, not as a licence or agreement to sell. The absence of exclusive possession of the whole area did not change that character. Because the arrangement was a lease, royalty paid under it was consideration for the lease and not the purchase price of goods. As there was no underlying sale or purchase, the conditions for levy under section 6-A of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 were not met, and sales tax could not be imposed on the royalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>