<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (9) TMI 228 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154344</link>
    <description>Section 18(7) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act applies only where sales to favoured buyers at abnormally low prices are shown to have been effected with the dominant object of evading tax. A longstanding distributing agency arrangement, existing since 1951 and found to be a genuine commercial structure aimed at reducing internal competition, did not satisfy that test merely because it incidentally produced a tax advantage. In the absence of proof that the agency was fake or that evasion was established, invocation of section 18(7) was unjustified, and the appellate view declining revision under section 39(2) was legally sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 11:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (9) TMI 228 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154344</link>
      <description>Section 18(7) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act applies only where sales to favoured buyers at abnormally low prices are shown to have been effected with the dominant object of evading tax. A longstanding distributing agency arrangement, existing since 1951 and found to be a genuine commercial structure aimed at reducing internal competition, did not satisfy that test merely because it incidentally produced a tax advantage. In the absence of proof that the agency was fake or that evasion was established, invocation of section 18(7) was unjustified, and the appellate view declining revision under section 39(2) was legally sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>