<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (11) TMI 305 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154333</link>
    <description>An exemption notification under the Bombay Sales Tax Act was construed by reference to its own context, so the phrase &quot;turnover of sales&quot; in the condition was read as referring only to taxable sales covered by the exempted class. On that reading, the exemption was not lost merely because the dealer&#039;s total turnover exceeded the stated limit. The phrase &quot;conducted primarily for the sale of sweetmeats&quot; was also held inapplicable to a hotel on a proper grammatical and contextual construction, so the dealer was not disentitled to relief on that basis. The commentary states that the exemption remained available on the facts found.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2013 14:35:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (11) TMI 305 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154333</link>
      <description>An exemption notification under the Bombay Sales Tax Act was construed by reference to its own context, so the phrase &quot;turnover of sales&quot; in the condition was read as referring only to taxable sales covered by the exempted class. On that reading, the exemption was not lost merely because the dealer&#039;s total turnover exceeded the stated limit. The phrase &quot;conducted primarily for the sale of sweetmeats&quot; was also held inapplicable to a hotel on a proper grammatical and contextual construction, so the dealer was not disentitled to relief on that basis. The commentary states that the exemption remained available on the facts found.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>