<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (12) TMI 276 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154309</link>
    <description>A State sales tax exemption granted to a registered small-scale industry for goods manufactured during a specified period was treated as a general exemption for section 8(2A) of the Central Sales Tax Act, because it applied broadly and was not limited by specified circumstances, conditions, or a special stage of levy. The Bombay HC analysis states that the amended wording of section 8(2A) did not narrow the concept of general exemption, and the omission of the word &quot;dealer&quot; did not alter that construction. On that basis, the local exemption was not caught by the exclusionary explanation, and the assessee&#039;s inter-State sales remained exempt from Central sales tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2013 12:07:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (12) TMI 276 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154309</link>
      <description>A State sales tax exemption granted to a registered small-scale industry for goods manufactured during a specified period was treated as a general exemption for section 8(2A) of the Central Sales Tax Act, because it applied broadly and was not limited by specified circumstances, conditions, or a special stage of levy. The Bombay HC analysis states that the amended wording of section 8(2A) did not narrow the concept of general exemption, and the omission of the word &quot;dealer&quot; did not alter that construction. On that basis, the local exemption was not caught by the exclusionary explanation, and the assessee&#039;s inter-State sales remained exempt from Central sales tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>