<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (4) TMI 266 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154303</link>
    <description>Section 6-B of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, as then in force, operated as a charging provision only for sales or purchases taxed under that Act and did not extend to inter-State sales assessed under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The proviso concerning declared goods limited the rate where the levy otherwise applied, but did not enlarge the charging field. Section 8 of the Central Sales Tax Act regulates the rate of tax on inter-State sales and does not itself authorise a State additional levy. Accordingly, additional tax under section 6-B could not be imposed on such turnover, and related notices were without jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2013 11:27:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (4) TMI 266 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154303</link>
      <description>Section 6-B of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, as then in force, operated as a charging provision only for sales or purchases taxed under that Act and did not extend to inter-State sales assessed under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The proviso concerning declared goods limited the rate where the levy otherwise applied, but did not enlarge the charging field. Section 8 of the Central Sales Tax Act regulates the rate of tax on inter-State sales and does not itself authorise a State additional levy. Accordingly, additional tax under section 6-B could not be imposed on such turnover, and related notices were without jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>