<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (2) TMI 228 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154248</link>
    <description>A taxing exemption notification covering processing of cereals and pulses was construed strictly and, applying ejusdem generis, the general word &quot;processing&quot; was confined to activities akin to thrashing, sifting and cleaning. It did not extend to manufacture of bread and biscuits, because processing and manufacture are not equivalent and manufacture is only the end result of one or more processes. The supporting material relied on by the assessee did not justify enlarging the exemption to manufactured goods. The turnover of bread and biscuits was therefore held taxable, and the exemption claim was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:38:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (2) TMI 228 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154248</link>
      <description>A taxing exemption notification covering processing of cereals and pulses was construed strictly and, applying ejusdem generis, the general word &quot;processing&quot; was confined to activities akin to thrashing, sifting and cleaning. It did not extend to manufacture of bread and biscuits, because processing and manufacture are not equivalent and manufacture is only the end result of one or more processes. The supporting material relied on by the assessee did not justify enlarging the exemption to manufactured goods. The turnover of bread and biscuits was therefore held taxable, and the exemption claim was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>