<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (12) TMI 271 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154240</link>
    <description>For the presumption under the penalty explanation to section 36(2)(c) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, the phrase &quot;the total amount of tax paid&quot; includes tax paid after the return is filed but before the assessment, reassessment, appellate, or revisional order is made. The provision operates only as a rebuttable presumption where tax paid is below eighty per cent of tax assessed or reassessed, and its language must be read plainly without adding a further time restriction. Payment made before assessment therefore counts for the statutory comparison, although concealment may still be proved independently of the presumption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2013 15:31:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (12) TMI 271 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154240</link>
      <description>For the presumption under the penalty explanation to section 36(2)(c) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, the phrase &quot;the total amount of tax paid&quot; includes tax paid after the return is filed but before the assessment, reassessment, appellate, or revisional order is made. The provision operates only as a rebuttable presumption where tax paid is below eighty per cent of tax assessed or reassessed, and its language must be read plainly without adding a further time restriction. Payment made before assessment therefore counts for the statutory comparison, although concealment may still be proved independently of the presumption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>