<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (3) TMI 361 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154230</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the tax case, upholding the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to add Rs. 20,000 to the turnover for the assessment year 1980-81. The court emphasized the lack of concrete evidence or special reasons provided by the assessees to dispute the sample survey findings from a subsequent year. The court found no justification for interfering with the Tribunal&#039;s order, noting the importance of comparable data for making best judgment assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2013 13:43:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (3) TMI 361 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154230</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the tax case, upholding the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to add Rs. 20,000 to the turnover for the assessment year 1980-81. The court emphasized the lack of concrete evidence or special reasons provided by the assessees to dispute the sample survey findings from a subsequent year. The court found no justification for interfering with the Tribunal&#039;s order, noting the importance of comparable data for making best judgment assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>