<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (2) TMI 306 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154229</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the pile carpets in question, with a jute base and woollen tufts, do not fall under item 4 of the Third Schedule to the State Act or section 14(x) of the Central Sales Tax Act. Therefore, the Tribunal&#039;s decision to treat the turnover as relating to pile carpets was upheld, and the tax case was dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2013 13:37:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (2) TMI 306 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154229</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the pile carpets in question, with a jute base and woollen tufts, do not fall under item 4 of the Third Schedule to the State Act or section 14(x) of the Central Sales Tax Act. Therefore, the Tribunal&#039;s decision to treat the turnover as relating to pile carpets was upheld, and the tax case was dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154229</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>