<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 978 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154213</link>
    <description>In passing-off matters, an interlocutory injunction may be granted where the plaintiff shows a prima facie reputation in the mark or name, deceptive similarity likely to cause confusion, and a risk of irreparable injury. The court assesses the resemblance between the competing names, the plaintiff&#039;s acquired distinctiveness and secondary meaning, the nature of the parties&#039; businesses, and the balance of convenience. On those principles, a long-used and distinctive corporate name justified restraining use of a deceptively similar trading style, and the confirmation of interim relief was upheld pending trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2013 14:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 978 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154213</link>
      <description>In passing-off matters, an interlocutory injunction may be granted where the plaintiff shows a prima facie reputation in the mark or name, deceptive similarity likely to cause confusion, and a risk of irreparable injury. The court assesses the resemblance between the competing names, the plaintiff&#039;s acquired distinctiveness and secondary meaning, the nature of the parties&#039; businesses, and the balance of convenience. On those principles, a long-used and distinctive corporate name justified restraining use of a deceptively similar trading style, and the confirmation of interim relief was upheld pending trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>