https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154212 A writ petition against a reassessment notice under the sales tax law was held not maintainable where the assessee had an adequate statutory remedy to object before the assessing authority and, if needed, pursue appellate and revisional remedies. Interference under Article 226 was confined to exceptional cases such as lack or excess of jurisdiction or breach of natural justice, and no patent jurisdictional defect was shown in issuing the notice under section 12. The disputed interpretation of packing material and related expressions was left to be examined in reassessment proceedings, and the pendency of a reference in another matter did not justify restraining the authority from proceeding according to law. en-us Fri, 16 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Aug 2013 11:44:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154212 A writ petition against a reassessment notice under the sales tax law was held not maintainable where the assessee had an adequate statutory remedy to object before the assessing authority and, if needed, pursue appellate and revisional remedies. Interference under Article 226 was confined to exceptional cases such as lack or excess of jurisdiction or breach of natural justice, and no patent jurisdictional defect was shown in issuing the notice under section 12. The disputed interpretation of packing material and related expressions was left to be examined in reassessment proceedings, and the pendency of a reference in another matter did not justify restraining the authority from proceeding according to law. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 16 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154212