https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154209 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the appellant was not entitled to relief in a case involving a dispute over the delivery of aeroscraps pledged as security for a loan. The appellant's denial of the pledge and failure to redeliver the goods meant he could not recover the debt without offering to return the goods. The court emphasized that the appellant could only recover the balance after giving credit for the value of the goods if unable to return them, dismissing the appeal and affirming the High Court's ruling. en-us Tue, 13 Dec 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Dec 2013 11:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154209 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the appellant was not entitled to relief in a case involving a dispute over the delivery of aeroscraps pledged as security for a loan. The appellant's denial of the pledge and failure to redeliver the goods meant he could not recover the debt without offering to return the goods. The court emphasized that the appellant could only recover the balance after giving credit for the value of the goods if unable to return them, dismissing the appeal and affirming the High Court's ruling. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 13 Dec 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154209