<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (7) TMI 289 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154143</link>
    <description>Purchase turnover taxable under section 7-A of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act was treated as part of the assessee&#039;s total turnover, in line with the binding Full Bench view and against the contrary Tribunal approach. For classification, amended entry 41 of the First Schedule, after deletion of the restrictive wording and express inclusion of wires, covered electrical goods including wires used for earthing. However, alloy copper wires could be brought within the entry only if the dominant or substantial user was earthing; because the record lacked a finding on that factual issue, the classification question was remitted to the assessing authority for fresh determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 18:25:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (7) TMI 289 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154143</link>
      <description>Purchase turnover taxable under section 7-A of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act was treated as part of the assessee&#039;s total turnover, in line with the binding Full Bench view and against the contrary Tribunal approach. For classification, amended entry 41 of the First Schedule, after deletion of the restrictive wording and express inclusion of wires, covered electrical goods including wires used for earthing. However, alloy copper wires could be brought within the entry only if the dominant or substantial user was earthing; because the record lacked a finding on that factual issue, the classification question was remitted to the assessing authority for fresh determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>