<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (11) TMI 265 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154121</link>
    <description>A Government standard-form contract condition that refused acceptance of ST-1 declaration forms and required separate payment of sales tax was inconsistent with the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975. The Act conferred a statutory deduction or exemption for sales to registered dealers on production of the prescribed declaration form, and the related rule only regulated procedure and supporting documents; it did not extinguish the substantive entitlement. A contractual term cannot override a statutory tax benefit, and a void condition cannot be validated by consent or waiver. The office order and amended condition were therefore invalid to the extent they barred the statutory deduction or exemption on first-point sales.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 18:13:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (11) TMI 265 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154121</link>
      <description>A Government standard-form contract condition that refused acceptance of ST-1 declaration forms and required separate payment of sales tax was inconsistent with the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975. The Act conferred a statutory deduction or exemption for sales to registered dealers on production of the prescribed declaration form, and the related rule only regulated procedure and supporting documents; it did not extinguish the substantive entitlement. A contractual term cannot override a statutory tax benefit, and a void condition cannot be validated by consent or waiver. The office order and amended condition were therefore invalid to the extent they barred the statutory deduction or exemption on first-point sales.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>