<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (3) TMI 247 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154109</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that there were two distinct contracts involved in the supply of printed materials by the assessees: one for material supply and the other for labor charges. The Court affirmed the separation of turnover into two parts, exempting the sales of paper and paper boards as second sales under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. The Revenue&#039;s challenge was dismissed, as there was no evidence to dispute the Tribunal&#039;s findings. The Court also rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument that these sales were first sales, noting the consistent exemption granted to the assessees for second sales. The tax case was dismissed, and costs were awarded to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 17:35:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (3) TMI 247 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154109</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that there were two distinct contracts involved in the supply of printed materials by the assessees: one for material supply and the other for labor charges. The Court affirmed the separation of turnover into two parts, exempting the sales of paper and paper boards as second sales under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. The Revenue&#039;s challenge was dismissed, as there was no evidence to dispute the Tribunal&#039;s findings. The Court also rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument that these sales were first sales, noting the consistent exemption granted to the assessees for second sales. The tax case was dismissed, and costs were awarded to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>