<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (9) TMI 263 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154095</link>
    <description>Additional sales tax under the Tamil Nadu Additional Sales Tax Act was held leviable where a dealer had already been assessed under the principal sales tax law and the dealer&#039;s total turnover exceeded the statutory threshold. The court reasoned that section 2(1) made the levy consequential to the original assessment and did not require a fresh inquiry into whether part of the turnover related to principals whose individual turnovers were below the limit. Once the assessees were assessed as dealers and crossed the prescribed turnover limit, liability to additional tax followed automatically, and the challenge to the levy failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 18:12:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (9) TMI 263 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154095</link>
      <description>Additional sales tax under the Tamil Nadu Additional Sales Tax Act was held leviable where a dealer had already been assessed under the principal sales tax law and the dealer&#039;s total turnover exceeded the statutory threshold. The court reasoned that section 2(1) made the levy consequential to the original assessment and did not require a fresh inquiry into whether part of the turnover related to principals whose individual turnovers were below the limit. Once the assessees were assessed as dealers and crossed the prescribed turnover limit, liability to additional tax followed automatically, and the challenge to the levy failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>