<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (2) TMI 270 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154086</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s power to entertain a Revenue petition for enhancement is not limited to turnover items specifically disputed before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. Following earlier Madras HC decisions, the Court held that enhancement remained maintainable even though the relevant turnover had not been questioned at the first appellate stage, and the matter was remitted to the Tribunal for consideration on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 17:38:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (2) TMI 270 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154086</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s power to entertain a Revenue petition for enhancement is not limited to turnover items specifically disputed before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. Following earlier Madras HC decisions, the Court held that enhancement remained maintainable even though the relevant turnover had not been questioned at the first appellate stage, and the matter was remitted to the Tribunal for consideration on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>