<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (6) TMI 167 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154059</link>
    <description>The Tribunal was justified in remanding the assessment for de novo disposal because the records needed to decide the taxability of the transactions were incomplete and the relevant agreements for the local purchase and import transactions were not available. On the existing material, a proper assessment could not be made, so the matter was sent back to obtain the necessary documents and decide the case afresh in accordance with law. The challenge to the remand was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 18:31:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (6) TMI 167 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154059</link>
      <description>The Tribunal was justified in remanding the assessment for de novo disposal because the records needed to decide the taxability of the transactions were incomplete and the relevant agreements for the local purchase and import transactions were not available. On the existing material, a proper assessment could not be made, so the matter was sent back to obtain the necessary documents and decide the case afresh in accordance with law. The challenge to the remand was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>