<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (3) TMI 351 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154051</link>
    <description>Certified seeds of cereals are not included within the term &quot;cereals&quot; in the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, because taxing entries must be construed in their popular and commercial sense, not in a botanical or technical sense. Seeds processed, treated, packed and sold for sowing have a distinct commercial identity from edible grain intended for human consumption, so they fall outside the cereal entries and are subject to multi-point tax under the general charging provision. Exemptions under section 8A cannot control the meaning of the charging entries. The Commissioner&#039;s circular was valid as a clarification of the correct statutory position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 17:47:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (3) TMI 351 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154051</link>
      <description>Certified seeds of cereals are not included within the term &quot;cereals&quot; in the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, because taxing entries must be construed in their popular and commercial sense, not in a botanical or technical sense. Seeds processed, treated, packed and sold for sowing have a distinct commercial identity from edible grain intended for human consumption, so they fall outside the cereal entries and are subject to multi-point tax under the general charging provision. Exemptions under section 8A cannot control the meaning of the charging entries. The Commissioner&#039;s circular was valid as a clarification of the correct statutory position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>