<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (9) TMI 222 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154022</link>
    <description>Sale of railway scrap was treated as business activity under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act because the sale of unserviceable material and scrap iron was held ancillary to commerce. Article 285 of the Constitution did not exempt such sales, as sales tax is levied on the transaction of sale and not directly on Union property. The transfer of the case to another assessing authority was upheld under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Rules, and the jurisdictional objection failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2013 18:08:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (9) TMI 222 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154022</link>
      <description>Sale of railway scrap was treated as business activity under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act because the sale of unserviceable material and scrap iron was held ancillary to commerce. Article 285 of the Constitution did not exempt such sales, as sales tax is levied on the transaction of sale and not directly on Union property. The transfer of the case to another assessing authority was upheld under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Rules, and the jurisdictional objection failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>