<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 792 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154019</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s claim challenging the State Information Commission&#039;s order denying disclosure of answer sheets of Constables from a promotion examination under the Right to Information Act, 2005. The court held that the exemption under Section 8(1)(d) applied as disclosure could harm competitive positions. Additionally, the court ruled that Section 11 did not apply as third-party consent was not sought and no larger public interest was established for disclosure. Consequently, the petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 15:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 792 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154019</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s claim challenging the State Information Commission&#039;s order denying disclosure of answer sheets of Constables from a promotion examination under the Right to Information Act, 2005. The court held that the exemption under Section 8(1)(d) applied as disclosure could harm competitive positions. Additionally, the court ruled that Section 11 did not apply as third-party consent was not sought and no larger public interest was established for disclosure. Consequently, the petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>