<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (12) TMI 157 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153992</link>
    <description>A writ petition was held maintainable despite alternative statutory remedies because a jurisdictional challenge to the assessment order was raised and the petition had already remained pending for years. On the export issue, turnover relating to spark plugs was held exempt under section 5(1) of the Central Sales Tax Act, as the transaction was treated as a sale occasioning export and not as a proved intervening sale to the intermediary corporation. The revenue failed to establish any separate taxable sale in India, and the burden to prove taxability remained on the revenue. The assessment order was set aside to the extent it denied export exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 17:23:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (12) TMI 157 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153992</link>
      <description>A writ petition was held maintainable despite alternative statutory remedies because a jurisdictional challenge to the assessment order was raised and the petition had already remained pending for years. On the export issue, turnover relating to spark plugs was held exempt under section 5(1) of the Central Sales Tax Act, as the transaction was treated as a sale occasioning export and not as a proved intervening sale to the intermediary corporation. The revenue failed to establish any separate taxable sale in India, and the burden to prove taxability remained on the revenue. The assessment order was set aside to the extent it denied export exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>