https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153983 The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeals against the order setting aside duty demand and penalties due to limitation issues. The High Court remanded the case to the Tribunal for breaching natural justice principles by dismissing the appeals without allowing the Revenue to address the limitation issue. The Revenue argued against the respondents' eligibility for concessional duty, invoking the extended period under section 11A of the Central Excise Act, alleging deliberate duty evasion. The Tribunal found the Revenue failed to prove the limitation aspect, leading to the rejection of the Revenue's appeal. en-us Tue, 22 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Aug 2013 15:36:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153983 The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeals against the order setting aside duty demand and penalties due to limitation issues. The High Court remanded the case to the Tribunal for breaching natural justice principles by dismissing the appeals without allowing the Revenue to address the limitation issue. The Revenue argued against the respondents' eligibility for concessional duty, invoking the extended period under section 11A of the Central Excise Act, alleging deliberate duty evasion. The Tribunal found the Revenue failed to prove the limitation aspect, leading to the rejection of the Revenue's appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 22 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153983