<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 800 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153971</link>
    <description>Imported photocopying equipment was found, on repeated examination in the importer&#039;s presence and on the importer&#039;s own statement under Section 108 of the Customs Act, to comprise 20 complete photocopying machines in SKD/CKD condition rather than mere components. The Tribunal treated the last examination report, placed on record pursuant to its direction, as binding on the parties and found no reliable evidence of indigenous procurement of essential parts. On that factual basis, the declared description was rejected, and the assessment and confiscation were sustained. The redemption fine and penalty were, however, reduced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 13:12:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 800 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153971</link>
      <description>Imported photocopying equipment was found, on repeated examination in the importer&#039;s presence and on the importer&#039;s own statement under Section 108 of the Customs Act, to comprise 20 complete photocopying machines in SKD/CKD condition rather than mere components. The Tribunal treated the last examination report, placed on record pursuant to its direction, as binding on the parties and found no reliable evidence of indigenous procurement of essential parts. On that factual basis, the declared description was rejected, and the assessment and confiscation were sustained. The redemption fine and penalty were, however, reduced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>