https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153969 In Appeal No. C/255/2009, the appellant's refund claim for special additional duty was remanded to the original authority for reconsideration based on new evidence presented during the hearing. The original authority was directed to make a decision within three months. In Appeal No. C/256/2009, the Tribunal rejected the appeal seeking directions for refund or finalization of Bills of Entry, stating that the Assistant Commissioner's advisory letter did not constitute a decision on the refund claim or Bills of Entry eligibility. en-us Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Aug 2013 13:00:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153969 In Appeal No. C/255/2009, the appellant's refund claim for special additional duty was remanded to the original authority for reconsideration based on new evidence presented during the hearing. The original authority was directed to make a decision within three months. In Appeal No. C/256/2009, the Tribunal rejected the appeal seeking directions for refund or finalization of Bills of Entry, stating that the Assistant Commissioner's advisory letter did not constitute a decision on the refund claim or Bills of Entry eligibility. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153969