<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (1) TMI 181 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153953</link>
    <description>Where a tribunal has found that a dealer collected only sale price and not any amount by way of tax, the statutory prohibition on unlawful tax collection is not breached and penalty under the Gujarat Sales Tax Act cannot survive. On those findings, further inquiry into the independent taxability of the underlying sales is irrelevant to penalty proceedings, particularly when the assessments have attained finality. A remand to the Sales Tax Officer for reconsideration of taxability was therefore unjustified, and the amounts recovered as penalty had to be refunded. The reference was answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 18:53:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (1) TMI 181 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153953</link>
      <description>Where a tribunal has found that a dealer collected only sale price and not any amount by way of tax, the statutory prohibition on unlawful tax collection is not breached and penalty under the Gujarat Sales Tax Act cannot survive. On those findings, further inquiry into the independent taxability of the underlying sales is irrelevant to penalty proceedings, particularly when the assessments have attained finality. A remand to the Sales Tax Officer for reconsideration of taxability was therefore unjustified, and the amounts recovered as penalty had to be refunded. The reference was answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>