<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (2) TMI 228 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153920</link>
    <description>Cleaning, cutting, sizing, packaging, or similar processing of prawns and lobsters did not create a new commercial commodity because the goods retained their essential identity despite the operations performed. On that basis, the exemption under section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 remained available, since mere processing without emergence of a distinct commercially recognised product does not alter the character of the original goods for sales tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 16:13:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (2) TMI 228 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153920</link>
      <description>Cleaning, cutting, sizing, packaging, or similar processing of prawns and lobsters did not create a new commercial commodity because the goods retained their essential identity despite the operations performed. On that basis, the exemption under section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 remained available, since mere processing without emergence of a distinct commercially recognised product does not alter the character of the original goods for sales tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>