<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (9) TMI 273 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153919</link>
    <description>The Schedule to the Calcutta Metropolitan entry tax law had to be construed strictly, because section 6 imposed liability only on goods clearly specified in the taxing entry. The term &quot;spices&quot; was read to mean flavouring substances used in food, judged by dictionary meaning and common understanding, but ambiguity in a fiscal provision had to be resolved in favour of the subject. On that construction, turmeric, cardamom, cloves and similar items were too general to fall within the generic head &quot;spices&quot; where turmeric was not separately identified as a taxable item. The goods were therefore not chargeable to entry tax under that entry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 16:09:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (9) TMI 273 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153919</link>
      <description>The Schedule to the Calcutta Metropolitan entry tax law had to be construed strictly, because section 6 imposed liability only on goods clearly specified in the taxing entry. The term &quot;spices&quot; was read to mean flavouring substances used in food, judged by dictionary meaning and common understanding, but ambiguity in a fiscal provision had to be resolved in favour of the subject. On that construction, turmeric, cardamom, cloves and similar items were too general to fall within the generic head &quot;spices&quot; where turmeric was not separately identified as a taxable item. The goods were therefore not chargeable to entry tax under that entry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>