https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153907 In this case, the Tribunal upheld the decision not to confiscate the Indian currency of Rs. 2.5 lakhs but rejected the stay application filed by the Revenue. The Tribunal also ruled against the confiscation of the vehicles, including a Mahindra & Mahindra Commander vehicle, a Mahindra & Mahindra Armada vehicle, and a Maruti 800 Car, due to lack of evidence proving their use for smuggling. Discrepancies in ownership details of the vehicles and the lack of response from owners were highlighted as factors in the decision to reject the appeals and stay applications. en-us Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Aug 2013 15:36:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153907 In this case, the Tribunal upheld the decision not to confiscate the Indian currency of Rs. 2.5 lakhs but rejected the stay application filed by the Revenue. The Tribunal also ruled against the confiscation of the vehicles, including a Mahindra & Mahindra Commander vehicle, a Mahindra & Mahindra Armada vehicle, and a Maruti 800 Car, due to lack of evidence proving their use for smuggling. Discrepancies in ownership details of the vehicles and the lack of response from owners were highlighted as factors in the decision to reject the appeals and stay applications. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153907