<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1066 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153897</link>
    <description>The appellant raised issues regarding the failure to examine records of a third party, the entire chain of dispatch, and the admissibility of Cenvat credit. The appellant argued that proper examination of third-party records and the dispatch chain would have revealed the truth and supported the grant of Cenvat credit. The lack of scrutiny of these aspects led to a plea for a remand to present a complete defense. The appellant emphasized the need for a thorough examination to establish the movement of goods and the absence of deliberate pilferage, highlighting legal shortcomings in the adjudication process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 14:49:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1066 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153897</link>
      <description>The appellant raised issues regarding the failure to examine records of a third party, the entire chain of dispatch, and the admissibility of Cenvat credit. The appellant argued that proper examination of third-party records and the dispatch chain would have revealed the truth and supported the grant of Cenvat credit. The lack of scrutiny of these aspects led to a plea for a remand to present a complete defense. The appellant emphasized the need for a thorough examination to establish the movement of goods and the absence of deliberate pilferage, highlighting legal shortcomings in the adjudication process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>