<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (5) TMI 173 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153881</link>
    <description>Ancillary transit-pass provisions under the U.P. Sales Tax framework are described as machinery measures aimed at preventing tax evasion. The text states that the State may use a rebuttable presumption of in-State sale when goods covered by a transit pass are not accounted for at the exit check post, provided the presumption does not alter the legal meaning of sale and remains open to rebuttal by evidence. It also records that the scheme is treated as a workable regulatory control, not an unreasonable restriction on trade, and that persons caught by the presumption may fall within the statutory definition of dealer for sales tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 13:57:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (5) TMI 173 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153881</link>
      <description>Ancillary transit-pass provisions under the U.P. Sales Tax framework are described as machinery measures aimed at preventing tax evasion. The text states that the State may use a rebuttable presumption of in-State sale when goods covered by a transit pass are not accounted for at the exit check post, provided the presumption does not alter the legal meaning of sale and remains open to rebuttal by evidence. It also records that the scheme is treated as a workable regulatory control, not an unreasonable restriction on trade, and that persons caught by the presumption may fall within the statutory definition of dealer for sales tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>