https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153880 Territorial jurisdiction under the original side of the Delhi High Court depended on whether any material fact constituting the cause of action arose in Delhi. The contract was executed in Bombay and performance was also to take place there; execution of the bank guarantee in Delhi and its transmission to Bombay did not amount to an essential part of the cause of action. Since a cause of action requires material facts that must be proved to obtain relief, the relevant facts arose outside Delhi, so the plaint was rightly returned for filing before the proper court. en-us Wed, 13 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jan 2017 17:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153880 Territorial jurisdiction under the original side of the Delhi High Court depended on whether any material fact constituting the cause of action arose in Delhi. The contract was executed in Bombay and performance was also to take place there; execution of the bank guarantee in Delhi and its transmission to Bombay did not amount to an essential part of the cause of action. Since a cause of action requires material facts that must be proved to obtain relief, the relevant facts arose outside Delhi, so the plaint was rightly returned for filing before the proper court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 13 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153880