<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 1052 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153866</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad dismissed Restoration of Applications (ROAs) filed by M/s. Shree Sanand Textile Industries Ltd. and M/s. Karan Fibres &amp;amp; Fabrics Ltd. seeking restoration of their appeals that were initially dismissed for non-compliance with stay orders. Despite being given additional time, the appellants failed to deposit the required duty amounts as directed. The Tribunal upheld its decision that the appellants lacked a prima facie case and rejected the ROA applications, affirming the dismissal of the appeals for non-compliance with the stay orders. Compliance with tribunal orders and the interests of both parties were emphasized in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 16:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 1052 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153866</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad dismissed Restoration of Applications (ROAs) filed by M/s. Shree Sanand Textile Industries Ltd. and M/s. Karan Fibres &amp;amp; Fabrics Ltd. seeking restoration of their appeals that were initially dismissed for non-compliance with stay orders. Despite being given additional time, the appellants failed to deposit the required duty amounts as directed. The Tribunal upheld its decision that the appellants lacked a prima facie case and rejected the ROA applications, affirming the dismissal of the appeals for non-compliance with the stay orders. Compliance with tribunal orders and the interests of both parties were emphasized in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>