<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1062 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153858</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the appellants were not eligible for exemption under Notification No. 3/2004-C.E. as their operations did not involve water processing as required. A duty amount of Rs. 2,77,378/- was demanded on cranes and spares. The Tribunal allowed a partial pre-deposit of Rs. 1.5 lakhs due to the appellants&#039; financial situation and complexity of the law, granting a stay on the recovery of the balance amount of duty and penalty during the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 10:49:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1062 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153858</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the appellants were not eligible for exemption under Notification No. 3/2004-C.E. as their operations did not involve water processing as required. A duty amount of Rs. 2,77,378/- was demanded on cranes and spares. The Tribunal allowed a partial pre-deposit of Rs. 1.5 lakhs due to the appellants&#039; financial situation and complexity of the law, granting a stay on the recovery of the balance amount of duty and penalty during the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153858</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>