<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (11) TMI 157 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153841</link>
    <description>Section 46(2) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 bars a registered dealer from collecting tax in excess of the amount properly attributable to its tax burden. The decisive factor is how the bill presents the surcharge: if it is shown as sales tax payable by the dealer to the Government, the collection is prohibited; if it is shown as a recoupment of tax passed on by vendors, recovery is not inherently unlawful. However, where the dealer recovers more from purchasers than the amount actually borne from vendors, the excess is a prohibited collection. Forfeiture is confined to that excess amount, not the full surcharge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 18:04:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (11) TMI 157 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153841</link>
      <description>Section 46(2) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 bars a registered dealer from collecting tax in excess of the amount properly attributable to its tax burden. The decisive factor is how the bill presents the surcharge: if it is shown as sales tax payable by the dealer to the Government, the collection is prohibited; if it is shown as a recoupment of tax passed on by vendors, recovery is not inherently unlawful. However, where the dealer recovers more from purchasers than the amount actually borne from vendors, the excess is a prohibited collection. Forfeiture is confined to that excess amount, not the full surcharge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>