<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1060 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153833</link>
    <description>Amendment of the Central Sales Tax Act restricted State-level exemptions or reduced rates on inter-State sales unless the prescribed conditions, including production of Form C/D, were met. Promissory estoppel did not preserve an exemption contrary to the amended statutory framework because the State&#039;s exemption power derived from that framework. Higher tax payable for failure to furnish Form C/D could nevertheless be adjusted against the monetary ceiling in an eligibility certificate under the U.P. Trade Tax Act. The tax rate did not alter the available incentive, which depended on production and compliance with the certificate&#039;s conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2014 10:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170868" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1060 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153833</link>
      <description>Amendment of the Central Sales Tax Act restricted State-level exemptions or reduced rates on inter-State sales unless the prescribed conditions, including production of Form C/D, were met. Promissory estoppel did not preserve an exemption contrary to the amended statutory framework because the State&#039;s exemption power derived from that framework. Higher tax payable for failure to furnish Form C/D could nevertheless be adjusted against the monetary ceiling in an eligibility certificate under the U.P. Trade Tax Act. The tax rate did not alter the available incentive, which depended on production and compliance with the certificate&#039;s conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>