<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1059 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153832</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Department&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) decision in favor of the respondent, a manufacturer of AMT Transformers. The issue revolved around the treatment of cleared CRGO scrap as unused CRGO sheets. The Tribunal determined that the cleared items were waste and scrap from the manufacturing process, not unused CRGO sheets. Upholding the appeal would result in unjustified litigation, as the respondents were users, not manufacturers, of CRGO sheets. Therefore, the Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, maintaining the decision in favor of the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:58:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1059 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153832</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Department&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) decision in favor of the respondent, a manufacturer of AMT Transformers. The issue revolved around the treatment of cleared CRGO scrap as unused CRGO sheets. The Tribunal determined that the cleared items were waste and scrap from the manufacturing process, not unused CRGO sheets. Upholding the appeal would result in unjustified litigation, as the respondents were users, not manufacturers, of CRGO sheets. Therefore, the Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, maintaining the decision in favor of the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>