https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153831 The appeal involved a dispute over duty demand on PVC Pipes Fitting, PVC Pipes, and Lubricated HDPE Pipes due to alleged clandestine removal. The Additional Commissioner dropped the proceedings, but the Department appealed. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the duty demand, prompting a challenge. The impugned order was set aside as the Commissioner (Appeals) failed to properly analyze the documentary evidence. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration after ensuring a thorough review of all relevant records. en-us Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:41:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153831 The appeal involved a dispute over duty demand on PVC Pipes Fitting, PVC Pipes, and Lubricated HDPE Pipes due to alleged clandestine removal. The Additional Commissioner dropped the proceedings, but the Department appealed. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the duty demand, prompting a challenge. The impugned order was set aside as the Commissioner (Appeals) failed to properly analyze the documentary evidence. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration after ensuring a thorough review of all relevant records. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153831