<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 782 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153827</link>
    <description>Acquittal in connected criminal proceedings may support a prima facie case for interim protection against customs penalty recovery. In this CESTAT note, proceedings under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 were considered at the stay stage, and the applicants relied on the Special Judge&#039;s acquittal for the relevant customs offences. That acquittal was treated as sufficient basis to waive pre-deposit of penalty and stay recovery pending disposal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:12:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 782 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153827</link>
      <description>Acquittal in connected criminal proceedings may support a prima facie case for interim protection against customs penalty recovery. In this CESTAT note, proceedings under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 were considered at the stay stage, and the applicants relied on the Special Judge&#039;s acquittal for the relevant customs offences. That acquittal was treated as sufficient basis to waive pre-deposit of penalty and stay recovery pending disposal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>