https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153809 The appeal was dismissed, and the revocation of the CHA licence was sustained. The Tribunal found that the appellant committed breaches of Regulations 13(a), 13(b), 13(d), and 13(e) of the CHALR, 2004, and upheld the punishment of licence revocation and forfeiture of the security deposit. en-us Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 May 2017 09:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153809 The appeal was dismissed, and the revocation of the CHA licence was sustained. The Tribunal found that the appellant committed breaches of Regulations 13(a), 13(b), 13(d), and 13(e) of the CHALR, 2004, and upheld the punishment of licence revocation and forfeiture of the security deposit. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153809