<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1050 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153792</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the restoration of the appeal by the Revenue, citing the proper steps taken. The Tribunal upheld the reduction of redemption fine and penalty to 10% and 5%, emphasizing consistency in rates to prevent discrimination. The decision underscored adherence to procedural requirements in appeals, consideration of profit margins in determining fines, and the necessity of uniformity in applying rates for fairness and non-discrimination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:57:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1050 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153792</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the restoration of the appeal by the Revenue, citing the proper steps taken. The Tribunal upheld the reduction of redemption fine and penalty to 10% and 5%, emphasizing consistency in rates to prevent discrimination. The decision underscored adherence to procedural requirements in appeals, consideration of profit margins in determining fines, and the necessity of uniformity in applying rates for fairness and non-discrimination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>