https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153775 Section 100 CPC requires a substantial question of law as a condition precedent to a second appeal, and Section 103 CPC permits factual determination only in exceptional cases where the record is sufficient and the issue was wrongly decided below. The High Court reversed concurrent factual findings without framing the requisite question or meeting the Section 103 threshold, so its interference was unwarranted. On the electricity dispute, the revised bill was unsustainable because the Board had not installed a check meter, had given no prior notice or opportunity before revision, and had not issued the contractual show cause notice required before recovery through a supplementary bill. The appellant succeeded. en-us Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Jul 2022 12:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153775 Section 100 CPC requires a substantial question of law as a condition precedent to a second appeal, and Section 103 CPC permits factual determination only in exceptional cases where the record is sufficient and the issue was wrongly decided below. The High Court reversed concurrent factual findings without framing the requisite question or meeting the Section 103 threshold, so its interference was unwarranted. On the electricity dispute, the revised bill was unsustainable because the Board had not installed a check meter, had given no prior notice or opportunity before revision, and had not issued the contractual show cause notice required before recovery through a supplementary bill. The appellant succeeded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153775