<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 742 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153771</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD allowed the appeals, providing relief to the appellant. The Tribunal found that customs duty demand and penalty under the Customs Act were not justified due to insufficient evidence of imported fabrics. It was held that the fabrics were obtained locally, not imported, and thus Central Excise duty, not Customs duty, should apply. The lower authorities failed to verify this crucial aspect, leading to the decision in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:43:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 742 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153771</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD allowed the appeals, providing relief to the appellant. The Tribunal found that customs duty demand and penalty under the Customs Act were not justified due to insufficient evidence of imported fabrics. It was held that the fabrics were obtained locally, not imported, and thus Central Excise duty, not Customs duty, should apply. The lower authorities failed to verify this crucial aspect, leading to the decision in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>