https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153770 The court upheld the confiscation of goods and imposition of penalties but reduced the redemption fine and penalty amounts. The judge found the discrepancy to be a result of non-maintenance of proper accounts, leading to a reduction in the fines imposed on the appellant-company and the Head (CFA). The penalty imposed on the commercial head of the factory was set aside due to insufficient evidence of his knowledge of the shortage, resulting in the appeal being allowed with consequential relief. en-us Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:37:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153770 The court upheld the confiscation of goods and imposition of penalties but reduced the redemption fine and penalty amounts. The judge found the discrepancy to be a result of non-maintenance of proper accounts, leading to a reduction in the fines imposed on the appellant-company and the Head (CFA). The penalty imposed on the commercial head of the factory was set aside due to insufficient evidence of his knowledge of the shortage, resulting in the appeal being allowed with consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153770