<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 844 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153764</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the confirmation of interest and penalty on Cenvat credit reversal for cancelled stocks and flood damaged goods. The decision highlighted that the notification introducing the credit reversal provision was not retrospective, and the appellant&#039;s actions were in line with established case law precedents, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 10:35:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 844 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153764</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the confirmation of interest and penalty on Cenvat credit reversal for cancelled stocks and flood damaged goods. The decision highlighted that the notification introducing the credit reversal provision was not retrospective, and the appellant&#039;s actions were in line with established case law precedents, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>