<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 1043 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153763</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) and allowed the appeals by way of remand, directing the lower appellate authority to pass fresh orders in accordance with the law and the Tribunal&#039;s view on the scope of Rule 7. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessee should be given a reasonable opportunity to be heard in the process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 10:28:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 1043 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153763</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) and allowed the appeals by way of remand, directing the lower appellate authority to pass fresh orders in accordance with the law and the Tribunal&#039;s view on the scope of Rule 7. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessee should be given a reasonable opportunity to be heard in the process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>