<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 843 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153760</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s findings, confirming the duty demand and penalties imposed on the appellants for their involvement in the clandestine removal of goods. The evidence, including corroborated invoices and suspicious financial transactions, met the preponderance of probability standard. The appeals were rejected, affirming the penalties imposed on the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 18:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 843 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153760</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s findings, confirming the duty demand and penalties imposed on the appellants for their involvement in the clandestine removal of goods. The evidence, including corroborated invoices and suspicious financial transactions, met the preponderance of probability standard. The appeals were rejected, affirming the penalties imposed on the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>