<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 740 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153759</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal by the Department, directing the Commissioner (Appeals) to reconsider the eligibility of Cenvat credit on paints and primer separately from the issue of credit on white lead and red lead. The Tribunal held that the doctrine of merger did not apply as the issues in the appeals were distinct. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration to ensure a fair hearing for both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2013 17:53:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 740 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153759</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal by the Department, directing the Commissioner (Appeals) to reconsider the eligibility of Cenvat credit on paints and primer separately from the issue of credit on white lead and red lead. The Tribunal held that the doctrine of merger did not apply as the issues in the appeals were distinct. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration to ensure a fair hearing for both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>